Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  286 / 413 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 286 / 413 Next Page
Page Background

8

2007 vol. 2

Clinical/Forensics/Toxicology

Figure 2

A base-deactivated inlet liner provides highest mean

responses for PCP.

Figure 3

Linearity plots for all drugs, analyzed using a

base-deactivated inlet liner and an Rtx®-5 Amine column.

Figure 1

Basic compounds can react with silanol groups on glass

liner surfaces, causing poor chromatography.

Clinical and forensic toxicologists are required to

detect low levels of abused drugs in body fluids and

confirm their presence by GC/MS. Typical limits of

detection are 1-15ng/mL, depending on the sample

matrix. For basic drugs (e.g., Figure 1), selecting

the proper surface treatment for the GC inlet liner

is important, because this parameter can affect

responses. The surface of a glass inlet liner contains

active silanol groups (Si-OH) that can act as elec-

tron pair acceptors, and react with nitrogen or oxy-

gen electron pair donors in basic drug molecules

(Figure 2).

1

These reactions usually are rapid and

reversible, but they are expressed chromatographi-

cally as broad, tailing peaks and/or reduced

responses. To eliminate these acid-base reactions,

make chromatographic peaks sharp, Gaussian, and

easy to integrate, and thereby help ensure repro-

ducible and accurate responses, the -OH groups on

the glass surface must be deactivated.

We evaluated several alternatives for deactivating

inlet liners to determine the best deactivation

chemistry for the analysis of basic drugs. Standards

composed of the free base forms of the drugs

shown in Figure 1 were prepared at concentrations

of 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 ng/mL for analysis on a

15m, 0.25mm ID, 0.25μm Rtx®-5 Amine column

(5% diphenyl/95% dimethyl polysiloxane station-

ary phase). The analysis of these drug standards

was repeated on a series of 4mm ID single goose-

neck liners that had been treated with different

deactivation techniques, as well as an untreated

liner. Three replicate analyses were performed on

each liner to determine which deactivation treat-

ment offered the highest and most consistent

response for these basic drugs.

We used these results to generate box plots that

display the range of data distribution, or variation

– an indication of the reproducibility of the per-

formance. We chose phencyclidine (PCP) and

cocaine plots to represent the nitrogen-containing

and nitrogen/oxygen-containing drugs, respective-

ly (Figure 2). The line in each box indicates the

mean response.

The data show that undeactivated liners and liners

that received intermediate polarity treatment pro-

vided poorer responses or reproducibility, com-

GC Inlet Liner Deactivations for Basic Drug Analysis

By Kristi Sellers, Clinical/Forensic Innovations Chemist, and Lydia Nolan, Innovations Chemist

• Base-deactivated inlet liners are inert to basic drugs, for greater responses.

• Inertness of Rtx®-5 Amine column is enhanced for basic compounds.

• Use this liner / column combination for the lowest %RSDs for basic drugs.

Benzphetamine

Cocaine

Alprazolam

Phencyclidine

Ketamine

Methadone

Codeine

Undeactivated

Glass Surface

Si

O Si

O Si

OH

OH

OH

5ng PCP

5ng Cocaine

Base

Deactivation

Conventional

Deactivation

Base

Deactivation

Conventional

Deactivation

Liner

ng/mL on column

Liner

PCP Area

area counts

Cocaine Area

90

80

70

60

50

145

140

135

130

125

120

2500

Benzphetamine

Ketamine

Phencyclidine

Methadone

Cocaine

Codeine

Alprazolam

2000

1500

1000

500

0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100