Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  238 / 413 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 238 / 413 Next Page
Page Background

8

2007 vol. 4

Clinical/Forensics

Simplify and Speed Up Opiates Analysis

Using LC/MS/MS & an Allure® PFP Propyl HPLC Column

By Kristi Sellers, Innovations Chemist

• 7-minute analysis time, for increased

sample throughput.

• Faster sample prep—no derivatization

required.

• Separate compounds with similar mass

spectra.

Opiates are one of the primary drug classes tested

in clinical and forensic laboratories, and most con-

firmation methods use GC/MS. These methods

require derivatization of the target compounds,

which significantly lengthens sample preparation

time. Here we present an alternative confirmation

method, using LC/MS/MS, which can increase

sample throughput by eliminating derivatization

and shortening analysis time. This procedure also

provides accurate confirmation and quantification

of compounds that have similar mass spectra, by

using an Allure® PFP Propyl column to chromato-

graphically separate compounds that share product

ions, allowing positive identification based on

retention time.

In developing this LC/MS/MS method for the

analysis of opiates, our goals were to obtain baseline

resolution of compounds having similar mass

spectra while providing an analysis time of less

than 10 minutes. To accomplish this, mass spec-

trometer conditions, column selection, mobile

phase, and gradient profiling were evaluated and

optimized. Several different stationary phases ini-

tially were evaluated including an aqueous C18, a

biphenyl, a propyl cyano, and a pentaflurophenyl

propyl stationary phase. Consistent column dimen-

sions and base silica (50mm, 2.1mm ID, 5µm par-

ticle size, and 60Å pore size) were used for all phases;

mobile phase conditions were optimized for each

stationary phase. Mobile phases tested included:

0.1% formic acid in water, 0.1% formic acid in

acetonitrile, and 0.1% formic acid in methanol in

various combinations. A variety of gradient profiles

also were evaluated.

Figure 1

Codeine and hydrocodone share product ions and must

be separated chromatographically.

Table I

+MRM Transitions for Opiates.

LC_PH0457

A. Codeine

LC_PH0458

B. Hydrocodone

Mass Spectrometer Experiments:

Declustering Collision

Compound

Q1

Q3 Potential (V)

Energy (V)

morphine

286 152

46

79

morphine

286 165

46

51

hydromorphone

286 185

46

41

hydromorphone

286 157

46

55

oxymorphone

302 227

36

37

oxymorphone

302 198

36

55

codeine

300 152

46

85

codeine

300 115

46

89

hydrocodone

300 199

46

39

hydrocodone

300 128

46

69

oxycodone

316 240

31

39

oxycodone

316 256

31

33

6-monoacetylmorphine 328 211

51

55

6-monoacetylmorphine 328 193

51

35

For conditions see Figure 2.