Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  56 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 56 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

• 6 •

800-356-1688 •

www.restek.com

2005 vol. 1

Accurate analyses for

parts-per-million to

parts-per-billion levels of

organosulfur compounds

in petrochemical streams

are critical to meeting

new regulations for

lower levels of sulfur in

diesel fuel and gasoline.

Many sulfur compounds,

including hydrogen sul-

fide, methyl mercaptan, and ethyl mercaptan,

adsorb strongly to metal surfaces in sampling,

storage, and transfer apparatus. In addition to

causing inaccurate, falsely low values, adsorp-

tion can prolong analysis cycle times. To deter-

mine quantitative losses of active sulfur species,

we sampled, stored, and transferred low ppmv

to low ppbv concentrations of active sulfur

gases, using control (untreated) and Sulfinert

®

treated system components.

Preventing Sulfur Compound Losses

During Storage

Figure 1a depicts results from a comparison in

which a gas containing 17ppbv of hydrogen sul-

fide was stored for 7 days in untreated or in

Sulfinert

®

treated stainless steel sample cylin-

ders. The response ratio for hydrogen sulfide,

relative to a stable reference material, dimethyl

sulfide, is steady at approximately 1:1 for at

least seven days in Sulfinert

®

treated cylinders.

The data show a Sulfinert

®

treated system will

reliably store ppb levels of the active sulfur-con-

taining compound during transport from the

sampling site to the analytical laboratory. In

contrast, hydrogen sulfide degraded rapidly in

the untreated cylinder, and was lost totally with-

in 24 hours.

In a similar study in which gas containing

18.8ppbv methyl mercaptan was stored for 60

hours in Sulfinert

®

treated sample cylinders,

recovery of the active sulfur compound was

equally high relative to the stable reference mate-

rial, dimethyl mercaptan, as shown in Figure 1b.

Sample Transfer: Adsorption of Sulfur

Compounds to Tubing

Comparison of Sulfinert

®

treated electropolished

stainless steel tubing (TrueTube

EPS tubing,

surface roughness average (RA): 5-10, O'Brien

Corporation, St. Louis, MO), untreated electrop-

olished stainless steel tubing (TrueTube

EP tub-

ing, RA 5-10, O'Brien Corporation), and raw

commercial grade stainless steel tubing (RA 23-

27) showed only the Sulfinert

®

treated electrop-

olished tubing has the inertness necessary for

quantitatively transferring low ppmv to low ppbv

concentrations of sulfur compounds. Figures 2

and 3 depict the results (seamless 316L stain-

less steel, 1/8" OD, 0.020" wall). Tests were per-

formed at room temperature, using a gas flow

rate of 40cc/minute.

To confirm whether an active sulfur-containing

compound in a gas stream passing through 100-

foot (30.5-meter) lengths of tubing would adsorb

to active sites on the tubing surface, we meas-

ured the amount of time elapsed before values

for the sulfur content exiting the tubing were

stable and accurate, using helium containing

0.500ppmv methyl mercaptan. Figure 2 shows

Sulfinert

®

treated electropolished tubing did not

adsorb methyl mercaptan to any measurable

extent, delivering a representative sample with

no delay. Untreated electropolished tubing, in

contrast, totally adsorbed methyl mercaptan for

more than 75 minutes, and the sulfur gas level

did not stabilize until approximately 130 min-

utes. Conventional 316L seamless tubing totally

adsorbed methyl mercaptan for more than 90

minutes, and the sulfur gas level did not stabi-

lize until approximately 140 minutes.

When adsorption of sulfur-containing com-

pounds is prolonged, desorption from the sur-

face also is slow. This “memory” of adsorbed

compounds can cause long delays in equilibrat-

ing a sample stream. In Figure 3, Sulfinert

®

treated tubing shows the lowest retention of

sulfur compounds, by several orders of magni-

tude. Samples can be evaluated, with accurate

results, with no delay between them.

Superior Storage and Transfer of Sulfur

Compounds

Sulfinert

®

Treated Systems Preserve ppb Levels of Active Compounds

Gary Barone, Restek Performance Coatings Division Manager, David Smith, RPC Chief Scientist,

and Martin Higgins, RPC Chief Engineer

• Improve analytical accuracy and reduce system cycle times, using Sulfinert

®

treated products.

• Increase analytical confidence for low parts-per-billion sulfur compounds, using Sulfinert

®

treated sample cylinders.

• Transfer sulfurs in gas streams, without loss, using Sulfinert

®

treated electropolished tubing.

Figure 1

Sulfur compounds are stable in Sulfinert® treated stainless steel systems

a) 17ppbv hydrogen sulfide in 500mL cylinders

b) 18.8ppbv methyl mercaptan in 300mL cylinders

Figure 2

Sulfinert® treated electropolished

seamless stainless steel tubing (red) does not

adsorb methyl mercaptan (500ppbv).

Blue-untreated electropolished tubing;

violet-raw tubing.

Figure 3

Sulfur memory is prolonged in raw

commercial grade stainless steel tubing (violet).

Red-Sulfinert® treated electropolished tubing;

blue-untreated electropolished tubing.

(500ppbv methyl mercaptan in helium)

Reference

1.

Application of TrueTube

in Analytical Measurement

Cardinal UHP August 2004

Available at

www.restekcoatings.com

or by contacting us at

800-356-1688, ext. 4. Request lit. cat.# 59088.

a)

b)