Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  16 / 413 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 413 Next Page
Page Background www.restek.com

14

By Jack Cochran, Julie Kowalski, and Amanda Rigdon

• Fast, simple modified QuEChERS extraction and silica cartridge SPE cleanup extend column lifetime and

reduces inlet maintenance.

• Novel Rxi®-PAH GC column selectivity ensures separation and accurate reporting of EFSA PAH4 and other key PAHs.

Traditionally, yerba mate tea, which is brewed from loose

Ilex para-

guariensis

leaves and stems, has been especially popular in Argentina,

Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. More recently, the popularity and eco-

nomic importance of mate tea has grown worldwide, due in part to

its reputation of providing numerous health benefits. Unfortunately,

a high incidence of esophageal cancer has been found in populations

with high mate tea consumption, indicating a possible link between

mate tea and cancer [1,2]. Since mate tea contains relatively high lev-

els of toxic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), accurate analysis

of these compounds is becoming increasingly important. Currently,

monitoring efforts are focused on two analyte lists recommended

by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA): EFSA PAH4 (benzo[a]

pyrene, chrysene, benz[a]anthracene, and benzo[b]fluoranthene) and

EFSA PAH8 (all PAH4 analytes plus benzo[k]fluoranthene, indeno[1,2,3-

cd]pyrene, dibenz[ah]anthracene, and benzo[ghi]perylene).

Due to the complexity of the botanical matrix, testing methods for

mate tea often use exhaustive sample preparation, including super-

critical fluid extraction, pressurized fluid extraction, and gel perme-

ation chromatography. In addition, isobaric compounds also make

PAH analysis difficult because, since isobars cannot be distinguished

by mass spectrometry, accurate reporting depends on being able

to obtain chromatographic separations. Given these challenges, our

goal was to develop a robust, yet simple, sample preparation method

for PAHs in tea. As shown here, we paired this sample preparation

approach with a highly selective GC column and both TOFMS and

MS/MS analyses to produce accurate quantitative data for critical

PAHs—including isobaric compounds—in a short analysis time.

Speedy Sample Preparation Saves Time and

Removes Matrix Interferences

QuEChERS sample preparation methods are a desirable alternative

because they are quick and easy, but still provide quality results. The

QuEChERS approach was originally designed for pesticide residues in

fruit and vegetables, but modifications such as those used here have

been developed to expand it beyond the original scope. Compounds

such as PAHs, veterinary drugs, and persistent organic pollutants have

been testing using QuEChERS methods in difficult commodities like

tea, spices, and tobacco. The procedure used here (see sidebar), was

much less time- and labor-intensive than traditional sample prepara-

tion methods for tea, and it effectively removed chlorophyll and other

nonvolatile materials that can quickly foul GC inlets and columns

(Figure 1). Not only was this approach fast and effective in removing

matrix interferences, but it also can save labs time and money by

reducing inlet maintenance and extending GC column lifetime.

Unique Rxi®-PAH Column Prevents Coelutions

and Ensures Accurate Reporting

An Rxi®-PAH column was chosen for this analysis because its novel

selectivity separates all priority compounds, including the EFSA

PAH4 subset as well as benzo [b], [k], and [j] fluoranthenes (Figure

1). During method development, accuracy was assessed based on

the recovery of 30 PAHs fortified at 500 ng/g in mate tea samples. In

addition, incurred PAH levels were determined in an unfortified tea

sample. Samples were analyzed by both GC-MS/MS and GC-TOFMS

and results using both techniques were quite similar for the EFSA

PAH4 compounds.

Overall, the modified QuEChERS method used here effectively pro-

duced good quantitative data for PAHs in mate teas. As shown in Table

I, satisfactory recoveries (72-130%) were obtained for the 500 ng/g

fortified sample and concentrations ranging from 7 ng/g to 540 ng/g

were determined in the unfortified sample. The selectivity of the Rxi®-

PAH column separated all isobars and allowed us to report accurate

values without bias from coeluting compounds. For example, this

method effectively separated triphenylene and chrysene, which are

New GC Method for Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds

in Yerba Mate Tea Combines Simplified Prep and Improved

Accuracy for EFSA PAH4 and EFSA PAH8 Compounds