Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  165 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 165 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Figure 3

A small amount of methanol finely tunes the separation of narcotic analgesics and acetaminophen

on an Ultra C18 column, as indicated by less peak tailing.

• 7 •

www.restekcorp.com

800-356-1688

These changes led to a slight increase in tailing for

all compounds on both Ultra C8 and Pinnacle II

C8 columns, but this was acceptable, especially

because the run time for the analysis was reduced

by a factor of 3 and resolution was improved by

59% to 79%. The system passed the system suitabil-

ity requirements in the USP monograph.

In the next experiment, we re-introduced the ion

pair reagent hexane sulfonic acid into the system

under the control of the pH 2.5 phosphate buffer

system. The run time doubled, relative to the origi-

nal procedure, demonstrating that TEA did affect

the concentration of the ion-pairing agent.

Reducing the concentration of ion pairing agent, or

using a shorter chain length ion-pairing agent,

might have been a better alternative to adding TEA.

The system still passed the system suitability

requirements listed by the USP, but the chro-

matogram was much noisier—and equilibration

problems seen in the USP 25 analysis returned.

After reviewing the monographs for admixtures con-

taining structurally related narcotics and acetamino-

phen, we created a single separation for morphine

sulfate, acetaminophen, codeine phosphate, oxy-

codone HCl, and hydrocodone bitartrate. The goal

was to create an adequate separation while keeping

the method as simple as possible. We chose an Ultra

C18 column and set detection to 235nm. All compo-

nents, including a small unknown peak, were sepa-

rated to baseline (Figure 2).

Next, we increased the amount of buffer to 90% (a

5% increase). This simple increase doubled the

analysis time. Resolution doubled between most

components, with the greatest change between acet-

aminophen and codeine. The unknown peak disap-

peared and probably co-eluted with morphine.

We adjusted the mobile phase ratio to 85:15,

buffer:organic solvent, using a 90:10 mixture of

acetonitrile and methanol as the organic solvent.

Resolution improved, relative to the original mobile

phase composition, analysis again was under 10

minutes, and the unknown peak returned (Figure

3). For this analysis, these conditions provided the

most desirable results.

In summary, the goal of any method should be to

achieve the most stable and robust separation.

Sometimes methods are more complicated than they

need to be, and this can make analysis unnecessari-

ly difficult. Even troubleshooting such methods adds

to production costs. When preparing to follow a

method always attempt to determine the reason a

reagent would be included in a mobile phase. Any

change or modification should have an established

scientific purpose. By creating more universal meth-

ods for analyses of structurally related compounds,

it should be possible to reduce costs for supplies,

increase laboratory analysis efficiency, and reduce

personnel training time.

For chromatograms illustrating the changes in sep-

aration that occur with each change in the mobile

phase, please request Applications Note #59453. If

you encounter problems when analyzing your sam-

ples according to an established method, our expe-

rienced Technical Service chemists will be glad to

help. Contact them at 800-356-1688, ext. 4 or 814-

353-1300, ext. 4, or contact your Restek represen-

tative.

Peak List:

Conc. (µg/mL)

Ret. Time (min.) Tailing Resolution

U. unknown

unknown

3.1

NA

NA

1. morphine sulfate

204

3.3

1.0

1.8

2. acetaminophen

92

5.0

1.1

14.1

3. codeine phosphate

216

5.5

1.4

2.6

4. oxycodone HCl

206

7.5

1.4

8.5

5. hydrocodone bitartrate 218

8.9

1.4

5.0

Sample:

Inj.:

4.0µL

Sample:

raw material mix

Solvent:

mobile phase

LC_0218

Column:

Ultra C18

Catalog #:

9174575

Dimensions:

250 x 4.6mm

Particle size:

5µm

Pore size:

100Å

Conditions:

Mobile phase:

A: pH 2.8 10mm

potassium phosphate

B: acetonitrile:

methanol (90:10 v/v)

(85A:15B, v/v)

Flow:

1.0mL/min.

Temp.:

27°C

Det.:

UV @ 235nm

Ordering Information

| Ultra C18 5µm Columns

1.0mm ID

2.1mm ID

3.2mm ID 4.0mm ID 4.6mm ID

Length

cat.#

cat.#

cat.#

cat.#

cat.#

30mm

9174531

9174532

9174533

— 9174535

50mm

9174551

9174552

9174553

— 9174555

100mm

9174511

9174512

9174513

9174514

9174515

150mm

9174561

9174562

9174563

9174564

9174565

200mm

9174521

9174522

9174523

— 9174525

250mm

9174571

9174572

9174573

— 9174575

Trident

Direct HPLC Guard Column System

Choose from three levels of protection!

Trident

Direct

high-pressure filter

Protection against

particulate matter.

Trident

Direct 1cm guard

cartridge holder with filter

Protection against

particulate matter.

Moderate protection against

irreversibly adsorbed compounds.

Trident

Direct 2cm guard

cartridge holder with filter

Protection against

particulate matter.

Maximum protection against

irreversibly adsorbed compounds.

for

more

info

For information about Trident

guard columns,

request the Trident

Fast Facts

(lit. cat.# 59314 and

59896).

compare

values to

Figure 2